Hemingway was a complicated man with a simple writing
style. Those who have read The Sun Also
Rises, or any other book by Hemingway, will likely agree with this
statement. Living in a post-war era of abandoned tradition, forgotten values,
and a lost generation, Ernest Hemingway was one among many who felt adrift. His
interaction amidst a society of exiles in foreign countries (in Hemingway’s
case, Paris) fed both his problems and his inspiration. Within A Moveable Feast, the conflict and
satisfaction that Hemingway experienced in his early writing career become
apparent. The reader is afforded a glimpse of an integral part of Hemingway’s
life, a blurry and streaked vision of the civility, hostility, and humanity of
Hemingway’s Paris.
The narrative within A
Moveable Feast is difficult for me to form an opinion on. But perhaps such
difficulty is a mark of the text’s success. For despite the direct, declarative
nature of Hemingway’s writing (which eschews adjectives in favor of conjunctions),
his A Moveable Feast remains rather
confusing. This quality is not due to the construction of the content; rather,
it is a quality created by the delivery of the content. All of Hemingway’s
life-changing, disastrous, or mundane memories of Paris are not meant to be
provided in his memoir. Instead, A
Moveable Feast appears to be designed as a rush of memories with an express
purpose of creating an impression. Surely Hemingway himself could not vividly
recount every major detail of his Paris era. Yet he was able to isolate certain
choice experiences and throw them together.
In weaving such a fragmented tapestry of life in Paris,
Hemingway creates meaning without even writing a word. The sentences are there,
yes, but they represent something greater. The passages of A Moveable Feast coalesce into a fireside chat, echoing the
sensation of one’s grandfather telling a story. The room is darkly lit, the
cold air is being warmed by the cozy heat of the burning logs, and you are
receiving a long, calm tale of some long-gone age. At least, such a notion is
what I receive. Throughout Hemingway’s simple, subtle text, I experience a
vague feeling of nostalgia, as well as an indistinct passage of time.
Admittedly, I was rather perplexed when I first started
reading A Moveable Feast, as I could
not really connect the text to current studies in AP Lang. Hemingway is all
well and good, but I was unable to connect his work to studies of articles,
arguments, and use of language. Then I realized that A Moveable Feast is rooted deeply in concepts of language use and
how words affect meaning. The book is not “1920s Paris as it was” but rather “1920s
Paris as portrayed by Ernest Hemingway”. Hemingway is very controlling in his
portrayals of his friends, acquaintances, and undesirables. For instance, Ford
Madox Ford is presented in a very particular light, as his presence is
described as “heavy, wheezing, ignoble” (Hemingway 86). In a subsequent
chapter, “The Birth of a New School”, Hemingway relates an entire conversation
with an unknown critic. The description of the critic speaks unfavorably
against the unfortunate man. Hemingway’s closing remarks, that “It would be
interesting and instructive if the young man had turned out to be a famous
critic but it did out turn out that way” (Hemingway 96) leaves the unnamed
critic as an embarrassed footnote in the broad scope of Hemingway’s memoir,
almost as an insult.
Truly, given Hemingway’s reign over his own memory, any
recounted conversation or event is bound to have partiality, prejudice, or
plain error. By studying the ways in which Hemingway creates definitive tones
and impressions, we study use of language in affecting and influencing the
reader. Given the nature of A Moveable
Feast, separating fact from fictionalized truth is a very difficult task to
take up (impossible without consulting outside sources). If I were to describe
the work as any one genre, I would likely declare it autobiographical. However,
as I wrote earlier, A Moveable Feast
is more a sensation than anything. It is a blurry and nostalgic story of
another time and place.
No comments:
Post a Comment