Only a few stories offer the same level of discomfort and
grotesqueness such as Joyce Carol Oates’s “Where Are You Going, Where Have You
Been”. Certainly, I have read my fair share of literature with sinister plots,
elements of horror, or uncomfortable depictions of violence and malice. With
Oates, however, the text features a creeping sensation, a gradual revelation of
a threat. If careless during the first reading of the short story, a person can
miss just how perverse and unsettling the images are, as well as the mood.
After reading through “‘Don’t You Know Who I Am?’ The Grotesque in Oates’s
‘Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been?’”, a critical essay, the troubling
undertone and symbolism of the story are even more hardened in my mind.
Of course, the story begins harmlessly enough. Connie is
introduced as a bit of a reckless daughter, more desiring to spend her days and
nights out feeling alive than with her family or in pursuit of some meaningful
occupation. Given the era in which Oates wrote “WAYGWHYB”, the character of
Connie may be seen as a fairly archetypal teenager of her time. Many of the
standard conventions and philosophies of old America were wearing thin, giving
way to liberating, stress-relieving, and often provocative new ideas and
interests. By 1974, the Vietnam War was coming to a close, but it had left a
nation of youth unsure of authority. Civil rights were a more manifest form of
the dismantling of old institutions. Counter culture, including rock and roll,
drug usage, and free love had their brief but impactful moment in society. In
some sense, all of these new values are bundled into Connie, but Connie comes
to represent something more. Connie represents not only an embracing of
youthful freedom but a negligence of everything else. The notion I receive from
Oates’s text is that Connie seizes upon an electric lifestyle for shallow,
selfish amusement, foregoing actual substance or meaning and endangering
herself because of this.
Given that I am in the group tasked with examining the
relationship between the character of Arnold Friend and the Devil, my
interpretation of “WAYGWHYB” is much more religion-centric. My analysis of
Oates’s story is influenced by the concepts of moral and spiritual decay, and
seduction by corruptive forces. Such concepts are very applicable to Connie,
starting from the first few paragraphs. In the critical essay “‘Don’t You Know
Who I Am?’ The Grotesque in Oates’s ‘Where Are You Going, Where Have You
Been?’”, by Joyce M. Wegs, Connie’s carefree attitude is treated as a dangerous
quality. Connie does not worship any amiable and constructive god, but rather
follows a god of sex, fast cars, and material possessions. Oates portrays
Connie’s “moral poverty” by “imaging a typical evening Connie spends at a
drive-in restaurant as a grotesquely parodied religious pilgrimage” (Wegs 100).
The restraint in the story is “bottle-shaped”, like the steeple of a church,
and has a hamburger-laden lad instead of a cross. Within the restaurant, “it is
the music which is ‘always in the background, like music at a church service’”
(Wegs 100). The irresponsible lifestyle of Connie is paralleled with one of the
most innocent lifestyles imaginable: a religious one. However, Connie quickly “discovers
that her dream love-god also wears the face of lust, evil, and death” (Wegs
99).
Still, Connie’s corruption is not truly apparent until
Arnold Friend is introduced. After the creepy, supernatural character comes onto
the scene, “WAYGWHYB” becomes a much more provocative and eerie depiction of a
teenager’s struggle of values and desires. As Wegs notes, “it is no accident
that Arnold’s clothes, car, speech, and taste in music reflect current teenage
chic almost exactly” (102). Arnold appears in the formal outfit of Connie’s
god, but he is rapidly revealed as a foul tempter. Though Connie is nearly
swayed at first, finding Arnold Friend to be interesting and mysterious, the
creep’s entire existence begins to place Connie on edge, from his sudden
arrival out of nowhere to his silent friend to his obviously feigned
relaxedness. Arguably, Oates intended to portray Arnold as Satan in disguise,
come to lure Connie with her own destructive passions and condemn her to Hell.
Friend’s wild hair, almost wig-like, could possibly hide devilish horns, while
his discolored neck reveals the likelihood of face make-up. No quality is as
convincing of Friend’s demonic nature as his movement, which “may be due to the
fact that it must be difficult to manipulate boots if one has cloven feet”
(Wegs 103).
While it is true that I began reading “WAYGWHYB”
predisposed to the notion that Arnold Friend is the Devil, I did not anticipate
Oates to portray Connie as she did. My initial impression was that Connie would
be a hapless, innocent girl horribly taken by some evil force. However, after
reading Oates’s story, and after soaking in the ideas presented by Wegs’s
critical essay, I now view Connie as a much less innocent individual, though no
less unfortunate. Oates certainly seemed to paint a portrait of Connie with
some amount of moral depravity and guilt. Ultimately, Connie’s dance with less
seemly and beneficial values leads to confrontation with the epitome of sin.
Certainly, modern readers may look on Connie and her activities as harmless,
the usual pursuits of teenagers everywhere. But, in terms of the 1970s, I think
Oates wrote Connie as a much more stark contrast to values of the day, a girl
representative of youth’s problems and a fear of what may result of the
developing culture. Regardless, I cannot help but feel pity for Connie, and
feel a tinge of horror at the subtly sinister, monstrous nature of Arnold
Friend.
Works
Cited
Oates, Joyce Carol.
“Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been?” Where
Are You Going, Where
Have You Been? Ed. Elaine Showalter. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2002. Print.
Wegs, Joyce M. “‘Don’t
You Know Who I Am?’ The Grotesque in Oates’s ‘Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been?’” Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been?
Ed. Elaine Showalter. New Brunswick,
NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2002. Print.
Nicely done Josh. Not only did you cover much of the information on our PowerPoint, but you also included new information. The part about the Vietnam War was very interesting and actually makes sense. The impact of the war and the marks it left behind on society explains why Connie's attitude towards her mother is so bad. Not only that, but the reader eventually sees the innocent Connie in the beginning slowly change throughout the story. Just like you said, Connie is portrayed as an innocent young girl who likes to socialize. However as the ideas of Wegs and other writers begin to sink in, our view of Connie changes drastically. Overall well done Josh.
ReplyDeleteI enjoy your points, Josh. I specifically liked how you referenced how Connie was a representation of the supposed rebelliousness of American youth during the time period. The point you made about how Connie isn't a girl who is scared or weak, but a girl who is hardheaded and makes poor choices, really brings the point some great contrast. Finally, I like how you looked at the book from a very historical lens, instead of any other, because, personally, I believe that the story should be analyzed in historical context more often. Overall, you are a great man and I like the socks you wear.
ReplyDelete